Skip to main content

About your Search

20100101
20100131
STATION
LANGUAGE
Search Results 0 to 3 of about 4 (some duplicates have been removed)
FOX News
Jan 28, 2010 8:00pm EST
: hi, i'm bill o'reilly, thanks for watching us tonight. is the president's speech over yet? that is the subject of this evening's talking points memo. that was a long deal last night, was it not? but i have to say the president delivered his speech very well. he seemed relaxed and in charge. because i am a simple man, as you know. i'm going to break the state of the union down in a very basic way and i will do it in three minutes, not 70. big theme of the night was job creation. the president believes the government should spend a ton of money providing jobs for the folks who don't have them. okay. i get it. but, with the deficit so huge, my simple question is why not try private incentives first? mr. obama is proposing tax break force american businesses to create jobs. that's good. tax cuts will stimulate spending so we need more of those. and let's bend over backwards to help small companies hire folks. private business the backbone in our economy and always has been. so talking points opposes massive federal spending on the job front unless the tax breaks don't work. ke
FOX News
Jan 10, 2010 6:00am EST
to use a weapon of mass destruction trying to kill 300 people. michael mukasey was the attorney general of the united states from 2007 to 2009. he joins me now. judge mukasey, welcome. >> good to be here, paul. >> you wrote this week that you don't think that abuell umar farouk abdulmutallab should have been charged in criminal court. >> the principal question is timing not where he ultimately wound up, it's secondary, but he should have been taken designated an unlawful enemy cot b bah-- combatant. or a belligerent-- >> sounds like a new yorker. >> and intent on intelligence gathering, he knew who put him on the plane and mixed up the stuff that he had in his underpants and he knew who had trained, radicalized him and so forth. he had a wealth of information weeks' never going toware about that and we're certainly not going to hair about it in a timely way and the failure to do that i think was major, major gaffe. >> paul: the argument from the administration, if he was named an enemy combatant he would have the right under a supreme court hearing to have an habesa hearing and could he
Search Results 0 to 3 of about 4 (some duplicates have been removed)